Welcome to Alexander Technique Science

This site is devoted to improving scientific understanding of the Alexander Technique (AT)—its principles, practices, reported and demonstrated benefits, and terminology. The content ranges from descriptions of direct experiments on the effects of AT lessons to focused explanations of relevant current science to rigorously researched history of the work. We reference recent peer-reviewed publications wherever possible.

We see this site as serving three primary audiences: Alexander Technique teachers and students who would like to better understand the work from a scientific perspective; scientists, medical professionals and other somatic or rehabilitation practitioners who are interested in the research basis for AT; and anyone who would like to explore scientific research on mind, movement, and posture. Read more.

About Us:

The main contributors to Alexander Technique Science are Tim Cacciatore, Rajal Cohen, Patrick Johnson, and Andrew McCann. Together we have many decades of both scientific research experience and Alexander Technique teaching experience. Learn more about us.

The Latest:

A New Scientific Model of the Alexander Technique, published in Kinesiology Review

Tim Cacciatore, Patrick Johnson, and Rajal Cohen propose an extensive model that explains experimental and anecdotal evidence of AT’s effects, recently published in a special issue of the Kinesiology Review. Read the article here.


Webinar: February 2021

Tim Cacciatore and Patrick Johnson offer a 7-week online webinar starting February 4th, 2021. Join us! Click here for full info.

Video Symposium: Current Scientific Research and Models for the Alexander Technique

Patrick Johnson, Tim Cacciatore, Rajal Cohen, and Ian Loram

This symposium addresses a need for specific, up-to-date, science-based models to help AT practitioners to better understand what we are learning and teaching physiologically, better communicate with scientists, medical professionals, and AT colleagues, and broaden the base of respect and understanding for our profession.

This symposium was presented as a live webinar on May 18, 2020 and featured four speakers:

  • Dr. Patrick Johnson (PhD Physics, STAT/NeVLAT certified teacher of AT)
  • Dr. Tim Cacciatore (PhD Neuroscience, STAT certified teacher of AT)
  • Assoc. Prof. Rajal Cohen (PhD, Associate Professor of Psychology University of Idaho, AmSAT certified teacher of AT)
  • Prof. Ian Loram (PhD, Professor of Neuromuscular Control of Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, PAAT certified teacher of AT)

Watch here.

Clockwise from upper left: Patrick Johnson, Rajal Cohen, Ian Loram, and Tim Cacciatore


A History of Magnus in the Alexander Technique

By Jean M.O. Fischer

This guest post by Jean M.O. Fischer, publisher of Mouritz Press, delves into the influence of Rudolf Magnus’ research on postural reflex on F.M. Alexander’s concept of the primary control. It was first published in the AmSAT Journal, Vol 15, 2019.

The story of Magnus and his concept of a central control in the Alexander Technique community is a story of misunderstandings, mistranslations, and the misapplication of science. While several other ideas, concepts, and theories in Alexander’s writings are forgotten today, Magnus’s work is still discussed. Why? What is clear is that Magnus’s work was seized upon by Alexander and many of his supporters as scientific proof, or at least corroboration, from the mid-1920s until the South African libel case in the late 1940s. What is less clear is the continued reference to Magnus in the Alexander Technique literature. This article covers some history of the Alexander Technique literature on Magnus through the decades… Read more.

Scroll to top