Debunking Body Tensegrity (Video)

Alexander Technique teachers aren’t alone among somatics practitioners in thinking that tensegrity is a good model for the musculoskeletal system. In this 20-minute talk first given to Australian Alexander Technique teachers during their 2018 Science and the Alexander Technique Webinar, Patrick Johnson goes in-depth on tensegrity. He shows that the tensegrity is biomechanically suspect and that articles promoting tensegrity are riddled with faulty reasoning, bad references, and a nearly total lack of experimental data.

11 thoughts on “Debunking Body Tensegrity (Video)

  1. Liked the video and explanation as well as the comments that followed. It is an enriching journey of continuous learning and checking held assumptions

  2. James S. and Lynne Conway requested that I repond to a critique of this video posted on the public youtube video link made by a Brazilian Professor. After checking first with Lynne I posted a complete 2000 word essay on the youtube site. For those interested, please view the comments there at . Enjoy!

  3. A response from Sergio Teixeira da Fonseca on the youtube video. If would be great to hear Dr. Johnson’s thoughts regarding Sergio’s comment. Thank you!

  4. Thanks Patrick, very interesting, clear and helpful. Any pointers as to where to start looking for the other models you refer to which explore non-localised tone? Many thanks!

    1. Glad you enjoyed it Joanna. If you have the time and funds, sign up for our 7 week webinar starting in a couple of weeks (I’m not sure we’ve posted the ad yet, but it is happening). If not, try to read the rather technical paper from 2017 by Alison and Ian Loram.
      I hope to create a followup video addressing this question soon. Also, look up open and closed kinetic chains and think about the overlapping multijoint nature of back muscles.

  5. Thank you for this clear explanation. I had heard you and Tim talking about it and so I ‘knew’ it was an at best incorrect model. I have a couple of the toys and sometimes use them mainly to show that if you distort a structure in one area it affects the whole. One reason I didn’t ever like the idea of the tensegrity model for us humans was that it seemed to suggest that pressure on our bones was bad, when we know that bones stay stronger if they are weight-bearing.

  6. Thank you very much, Patrick, for this clear presentation. I appreciate how you both acknowledge the attraction of tensegrity as a pedagogical tool for AT professionals— for example, how you separate the use of a tensegrity toys as a teaching tool as a metaphor for spring and bounce for our students from the reality of our actual musculoskeletal anatomical systems. What I take away from your clarifications in a nutshell is: 1) tensegrity structures exist; 2) ‘biotensegrity’ as a theoretical explanation of our musculoskeletal system is false. To me, this embraces both how human beings need — and crave! — metaphors, images, and ‘stories’ to stimulate, activate, and retain learning, while at the same time we can acknowledge that these are indeed useful acts of imagination, if you will, that motivate and enliven us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top